https://www.patentblurb.com/ 2026-04-06T01:44:03+00:00 https://www.patentblurb.com/ https://www.patentblurb.com/_media/wiki:logo.png text/html 2025-09-22T21:27:18+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://www.patentblurb.com/legal:eligible_subject_matter:start:analysis?rev=1758576438&do=diff Statutory Subject Matter: Legal Analyses Judge Plager, in dissent, criticizes Alice (posted 07/23/18) In [Interval Licensing LLC v. AOL, Apple, Google, Yahoo!], Judge Plager criticizes the Supreme Court's caselaw on abstractness, a judicially-created exception to the broad scope of §101 permissive language as to what types of inventions are patentable. This criticism came in the form of a dissent from our court's continued application of this incoherent body of doctrine. text/html 2025-09-22T21:27:06+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://www.patentblurb.com/legal:eligible_subject_matter:start:bilski?rev=1758576426&do=diff Statutory Subject Matter: Bilski line of cases SUPREME COURT On June 28, 2010, the S.Ct.'s long awaited ruling on [Bilski v. Kappos] was handed down, affirming the Federal Circuit's rulings approving of the machine-or-transformation test, however not the exclusive test but merely a <span class="wss-nowiki-section">(c)</span> text/html 2026-04-03T19:37:08+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://www.patentblurb.com/legal:eligible_subject_matter:start:examples?rev=1775245028&do=diff Eligibility: Example case law Fed. Cir. holds claims to targeted advertising as ineligible (posted 03/07/24} Claim 1. A method of targeting at least one associated advertisement from an Internet search [. . .], comprising: identifying at least one search result item [. . .];<span class="wss-nowiki-section">(c)</span> text/html 2025-09-22T21:26:34+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://www.patentblurb.com/legal:eligible_subject_matter:start:ksr_notes?rev=1758576394&do=diff Alice v CLS Bank - Observations on the Supreme Court Transcript (04/02/14) Some interesting stuff in the transcript of arguments in Alice v CLS Bank before the Supreme Court (attached). The court struggles to articulate how claims that could easily have been rejected under KSR obviousness analysis are unpatentable business method claims under 101. text/html 2025-09-22T21:27:06+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://www.patentblurb.com/legal:eligible_subject_matter:start:peg?rev=1758576426&do=diff Patent Examiner Guidelines USPTO issues subject matter eligibility guidance for AI inventions (posted 07/25/24) On July 17, 2024, the USPTO Guidance and issued new examples 47-49 related to artificial intelligence, expanding its overall guidance on the topic. Summary of USPTO's Guidance including recent caselawSummary Examples Examples Abstract Idea Groupings and Caselaw