<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.8" -->
<?xml-stylesheet href="https://www.patentblurb.com/lib/exe/css.php?s=feed" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
    <channel rdf:about="https://www.patentblurb.com/feed.php">
        <title>PatentBlurb - legal:cases</title>
        <description></description>
        <link>https://www.patentblurb.com/</link>
        <image rdf:resource="https://www.patentblurb.com/_media/wiki:logo.png" />
       <dc:date>2026-04-05T18:46:13+00:00</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.patentblurb.com/legal:cases:ebay?rev=1667226340&amp;do=diff"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.patentblurb.com/legal:cases:paragon_podiatry_lab_v_klm_lab?rev=1667226340&amp;do=diff"/>
            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
    </channel>
    <image rdf:about="https://www.patentblurb.com/_media/wiki:logo.png">
        <title>PatentBlurb</title>
        <link>https://www.patentblurb.com/</link>
        <url>https://www.patentblurb.com/_media/wiki:logo.png</url>
    </image>
    <item rdf:about="https://www.patentblurb.com/legal:cases:ebay?rev=1667226340&amp;do=diff">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2022-10-31T14:25:40+00:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com)</dc:creator>
        <title>ebay</title>
        <link>https://www.patentblurb.com/legal:cases:ebay?rev=1667226340&amp;do=diff</link>
        <description>EBay Inc v. MercExchange, L.L.C., 126 S. Ct. 1837 (2006)

Who:  The Supreme Court in a unanimous decision, with concurring opinions by Justices Roberts and Kennedy

Held:  Courts have discretion to grant injunctive relief for patent infringement only when traditional equity principles are satisfied.  Specifically, an injunction can only be granted when the plaintiff demonstrates:</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="https://www.patentblurb.com/legal:cases:paragon_podiatry_lab_v_klm_lab?rev=1667226340&amp;do=diff">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2022-10-31T14:25:40+00:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com)</dc:creator>
        <title>paragon_podiatry_lab_v_klm_lab</title>
        <link>https://www.patentblurb.com/legal:cases:paragon_podiatry_lab_v_klm_lab?rev=1667226340&amp;do=diff</link>
        <description>Paragon Podiatry Laboratory v. KLM Laboratory, Inc.

Opinion Text

Paragon Podiatry Laboratory, Inc., appeals from the grant of KLM Laboratories, Inc.&#039;s motion for summary judgment by the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The district court held Paragon&#039;s U.S. Patent No. 4,686,993 (the ‘993 patent) invalid under 35 U.S.C. Section 102(b) (1988) and unenforceable by reason of the applicant&#039;s inequitable conduct before the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO). We aff…</description>
    </item>
</rdf:RDF>
