<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.8" -->
<?xml-stylesheet href="https://www.patentblurb.com/lib/exe/css.php?s=feed" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
    <channel rdf:about="https://www.patentblurb.com/feed.php">
        <title>PatentBlurb - executive_offices</title>
        <description></description>
        <link>https://www.patentblurb.com/</link>
        <image rdf:resource="https://www.patentblurb.com/_media/wiki:logo.png" />
       <dc:date>2026-04-05T18:44:38+00:00</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.patentblurb.com/executive_offices:start?rev=1703102450&amp;do=diff"/>
            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
    </channel>
    <image rdf:about="https://www.patentblurb.com/_media/wiki:logo.png">
        <title>PatentBlurb</title>
        <link>https://www.patentblurb.com/</link>
        <url>https://www.patentblurb.com/_media/wiki:logo.png</url>
    </image>
    <item rdf:about="https://www.patentblurb.com/executive_offices:start?rev=1703102450&amp;do=diff">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2023-12-20T20:00:50+00:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com)</dc:creator>
        <title>start</title>
        <link>https://www.patentblurb.com/executive_offices:start?rev=1703102450&amp;do=diff</link>
        <description>Executive Offices

Oral Arguments: ([Transcript]) 


In [Arthrex v. Smith &amp; Nephew] (June 21, 2021) the Supreme Court held that “the unreviewable executive power exercised by [Administrative Law Judges] is incompatible with their status as inferior officers.”  In addition, the court vacated the Federal Circuit&#039;s remedy, which was to invalidate APJ&#039;s tenure protections, making them removable at will by the Secretary, because that remedy still does not afford the Director an opportunity to counter…</description>
    </item>
</rdf:RDF>
